An update on the monogenic causes of Parkinson's disease: Impact on patient stratification and personalised medicine.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder with both genetic and environmental contributions. Over the past two and a half decades, advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology have uncovered several monogenic forms of PD, linked to mutations in a number PD genes (collectively called PARK genes) such as SNCA, LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, and DJ-1. To date there are 26 PARK genes reported with more than 100 genetic variants that increase the risk of PD. These genetic mutations and variants influence disease onset, progression, and therapeutic responses, making them critical for understanding the precise molecular pathways that drive preferential dopaminergic neurodegeneration in PD. These discoveries have not only deepened our understanding of PD pathogenesis but also provided avenues for stratifying patients based on their genetic profiles and provided remarkable insights crucial in tailoring individualised therapeutic approaches. This review updates recent findings on monogenic causes of PD, genetic variants which are risk factors for developing the disease and their mechanistic implications in PD neuropathological landscape. In the later part of the review, we described how these monogenic discoveries have reshaped PD into a set of mechanistic subtypes that are amenable to stratification and precision therapeutics of personalised medicine for PD patients. A list of currently developing individualised disease-modifying therapies including small molecules, antisense oligonucleotide, siRNA and CRISPR based products and targeted immunotherapies are included followed by a discussion on current challenges in developing these medications. Translating this personalised therapeutic promise into routine clinical benefit will require parallel advances in science, trial methodology and regulation, financing and social policy. Crucially, these advances must be pursued with an explicit commitment to equity, robust ethical safeguards, and stakeholder engagement so that genotype-driven care becomes accessible and beneficial across global populations rather than an exclusive privilege for a few.
Authors
Asmi Asmi, Krishnan Krishnan, Alexander Alexander, Ameer Ameer, Nidhish Nidhish, Sen Chandra Sen Chandra, Keerthi Keerthi, Shenoi Shenoi, Chakravarthy Chakravarthy, Chandra Chandra
View on Pubmed