Diabetic Foot Ulcer-Associated Versus Other Lower-Extremity Necrotising Soft-Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
To compare clinical characteristics, microbiology, treatment burden and outcomes between lower-extremity necrotising soft tissue infections associated with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and lower-extremity necrotising soft tissue infections not associated with DFU. We retrospectively reviewed 86 surgically treated patients at a single tertiary hospital from 2015 to 2025. Twenty patients had diabetic foot ulcer-associated infections and 66 had infections from other causes. Baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, microbiology, resource utilisation, wound healing, amputation and mortality were compared between the cohorts. The diabetic foot ulcer-associated group had a longer diabetes duration, higher glycated haemoglobin and a greater prevalence of hypertension, coronary heart disease and chronic kidney disease. Microbiological profiles showed overlapping distributions of major pathogens. The proportion of patients who were alive with a healed wound at 90 days was lower in the DFU-associated group (35.0% vs. 80.3%), and overall amputation was more frequent (55.0% vs. 15.2%), primarily driven by minor amputation (40.0% vs. 1.5%). Major amputation (15.0% vs. 13.6%) and mortality (10.0% vs. 4.5%) did not differ statistically, although estimates were imprecise. Lower-extremity necrotising soft tissue infections associated with DFU were associated with greater comorbidity, resource utilisation, minor amputation and a lower proportion of patients alive with a healed wound at 90 days. This retrospective study cannot determine whether minor amputation improves survival or prevents major amputation.
Authors
Tang Tang, Guo Guo, He He, Song Song, Wang Wang, Zhang Zhang, Jin Jin, Jiang Jiang
View on Pubmed