Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine plus luspatercept versus cyclosporine in newly diagnosed non-transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia: A prospective randomized trial.
The clinical need for treating anemia in aplastic anemia (AA) patients remains unmet. Luspatercept has been shown to be effective in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS).
Patients who were newly diagnosed with non-transfusion-dependent non-severe AA (NTD-NSAA) were randomly assigned to receive either cyclosporine (CsA) combined with luspatercept or CsA monotherapy at a 1:1 ratio. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05399732) aimed to compare their treatment responses, safety, disease progression, and outcomes.
In total, 58 patients participated in the final analysis, with 29 receiving CsA+luspatercept and 29 receiving CsA monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 6-25) and 12 months (range: 7-25), respectively, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 69.0% vs. 37.9% (p = 0.018) at the 3rd month, 79.3% vs. 51.7% (p = 0.027) at the 6th month, and 72.4% vs. 51.7% (p = 0.104) at the end of follow-up. Patients receiving CsA+luspatercept had a shorter time to achieve a positive response than those receiving CsA alone (p = 0.004). A post hoc subgroup analysis based on age (< 60 vs. ≥60 years) showed no significant difference in ORRs for those < 60 years old. However, for patients ≥ 60 years old receiving CsA+luspatercept, a significantly greater ORR was demonstrated at both the 3rd month (p = 0.032) and 6th month (p = 0.046) compared with CsA monotherapy.
Compared with CsA monotherapy, the combination of CsA and luspatercept resulted in a higher response rate and a shorter time to response for patients with NTD-NSAA, with an acceptable safety profile. The benefit of CsA+luspatercept was most pronounced in older patients.
Patients who were newly diagnosed with non-transfusion-dependent non-severe AA (NTD-NSAA) were randomly assigned to receive either cyclosporine (CsA) combined with luspatercept or CsA monotherapy at a 1:1 ratio. This study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05399732) aimed to compare their treatment responses, safety, disease progression, and outcomes.
In total, 58 patients participated in the final analysis, with 29 receiving CsA+luspatercept and 29 receiving CsA monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 6-25) and 12 months (range: 7-25), respectively, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 69.0% vs. 37.9% (p = 0.018) at the 3rd month, 79.3% vs. 51.7% (p = 0.027) at the 6th month, and 72.4% vs. 51.7% (p = 0.104) at the end of follow-up. Patients receiving CsA+luspatercept had a shorter time to achieve a positive response than those receiving CsA alone (p = 0.004). A post hoc subgroup analysis based on age (< 60 vs. ≥60 years) showed no significant difference in ORRs for those < 60 years old. However, for patients ≥ 60 years old receiving CsA+luspatercept, a significantly greater ORR was demonstrated at both the 3rd month (p = 0.032) and 6th month (p = 0.046) compared with CsA monotherapy.
Compared with CsA monotherapy, the combination of CsA and luspatercept resulted in a higher response rate and a shorter time to response for patients with NTD-NSAA, with an acceptable safety profile. The benefit of CsA+luspatercept was most pronounced in older patients.