Feasibility and acceptability of pooled sputum testing for tuberculosis: a multicountry qualitative study of the Start4All project.
Tuberculosis (TB) remains underdiagnosed in many high-burden countries due to high costs and limited availability of rapid molecular tests. Globally, only half of people with TB receive a molecular test as their initial diagnostic test. Pooled testing combines sputum samples from multiple individuals into a single molecular assay, offering cost savings by optimising existing resources, particularly in resource-constrained health systems. Although pooled sputum testing has now been recommended by the World Health Organization in 2026, evidence on real-world feasibility and acceptability for people with TB and healthcare providers remains limited. This study explored multisectoral stakeholder perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of pooled sputum testing for TB.
Multicountry qualitative study using key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Data were analysed using a framework approach guided by established feasibility and acceptability models.
Facility and community settings across seven high-TB-burden countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Viet Nam.
Thirty-eight key informant interviews and 18 focus group discussions were conducted with National TB Programme (NTP) representatives, laboratory technicians, people with TB and international experts.
Pooled testing was considered feasible and acceptable in facility and community settings with greater confidence in countries with prior implementation experience. Feasibility depended on alignment with diagnostic algorithms and laboratory workflows, biosafety, training and clear standard operating procedures.Acceptability operated at two levels: early NTP engagement with healthcare providers to secure professional buy-in and clear communication between healthcare providers and people undergoing testing to support understanding.
Pooled testing was considered feasible and acceptable in settings with robust laboratory systems and routine practices. Readiness varied across countries, with some suitable for rapid implementation and scale-up while others required system strengthening. In settings perceived as having suitable infrastructure and readiness, pooled testing was viewed as a pragmatic strategy to optimise molecular TB testing.
Multicountry qualitative study using key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Data were analysed using a framework approach guided by established feasibility and acceptability models.
Facility and community settings across seven high-TB-burden countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, Cameroon, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Viet Nam.
Thirty-eight key informant interviews and 18 focus group discussions were conducted with National TB Programme (NTP) representatives, laboratory technicians, people with TB and international experts.
Pooled testing was considered feasible and acceptable in facility and community settings with greater confidence in countries with prior implementation experience. Feasibility depended on alignment with diagnostic algorithms and laboratory workflows, biosafety, training and clear standard operating procedures.Acceptability operated at two levels: early NTP engagement with healthcare providers to secure professional buy-in and clear communication between healthcare providers and people undergoing testing to support understanding.
Pooled testing was considered feasible and acceptable in settings with robust laboratory systems and routine practices. Readiness varied across countries, with some suitable for rapid implementation and scale-up while others required system strengthening. In settings perceived as having suitable infrastructure and readiness, pooled testing was viewed as a pragmatic strategy to optimise molecular TB testing.
Authors
Iem Iem, Vo Vo, Codlin Codlin, Iwakun Iwakun, Kwanjo Banda Kwanjo Banda, Okelloh Okelloh, Mbuli Mbuli, Dosea Dosea, Santos Santos, Chowdhury Chowdhury, Garg Garg, Creswell Creswell, Ringwald Ringwald, Cubas Atienzar Cubas Atienzar, Byrne Byrne, Wingfield Wingfield,
View on Pubmed