Gender as a moderator of the association between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among nursing students in Saudi Arabia.
Academic performance in nursing education is influenced by multiple psychosocial factors, including academic self-efficacy, defined as students' confidence in their ability to complete academic learning tasks successfully, which is consistently relevant to student achievement and adaptation. Gender disparities in academic self-efficacy and academic achievement have been observed across educational settings; however, limited research has examined whether gender moderates the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among nursing students in Saudi Arabia, particularly during curriculum transition.
This study aimed to explore the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among nursing students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia, and investigate whether gender moderates this relationship.
A quantitative cross-sectional comparative-correlational design was used among 441 fourth-year nursing students from two cohorts under a revised curriculum. Using total enumeration, all 458 eligible students were invited; 441 completed the survey. Academic self-efficacy was measured using the eight-item Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), whereas academic performance was based on registrar-obtained cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA). Because self-efficacy was measured in the fourth year and GPA incorporated earlier academic performance, analyses were interpreted as associations rather than temporal predictions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t tests with Cohen's d, Pearson correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression with a mean-centered interaction term.
The self-efficacy subscale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .870). Students reported high academic self-efficacy (M = 5.33, SD = 0.89) and Very Good academic performance (GPA M = 3.20, SD = 0.38). Female students had significantly higher GPA than male students, t(439) = -2.818, p = .005, d = -0.27, although academic self-efficacy did not differ significantly by gender, t(439) = 1.200, p = .231. The first cohort had significantly higher GPA than the second cohort, t(439) = 6.310, p < .001, d = 0.60, whereas the cohort difference in academic self-efficacy was not significant. Academic self-efficacy had a weak positive association with GPA, r(439) =.103, p = .030. Gender did not significantly moderate this association, delta R-squared = .004, F change(1, 437) = 1.641, p = .201.
Nursing students demonstrated high academic self-efficacy and Very Good academic performance. Fourth-year academic self-efficacy was positively but weakly associated with cumulative GPA, and this association did not differ significantly by gender. Because the variables were measured cross-sectionally and cumulative GPA included earlier academic performance, the findings do not establish that current self-efficacy predicted past achievement. Nursing education programs should therefore consider broader academic, curricular, psychosocial, and contextual factors when designing student support strategies.
This study aimed to explore the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among nursing students at the University of Hail, Saudi Arabia, and investigate whether gender moderates this relationship.
A quantitative cross-sectional comparative-correlational design was used among 441 fourth-year nursing students from two cohorts under a revised curriculum. Using total enumeration, all 458 eligible students were invited; 441 completed the survey. Academic self-efficacy was measured using the eight-item Self-Efficacy for Learning and Performance subscale of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), whereas academic performance was based on registrar-obtained cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA). Because self-efficacy was measured in the fourth year and GPA incorporated earlier academic performance, analyses were interpreted as associations rather than temporal predictions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t tests with Cohen's d, Pearson correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression with a mean-centered interaction term.
The self-efficacy subscale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .870). Students reported high academic self-efficacy (M = 5.33, SD = 0.89) and Very Good academic performance (GPA M = 3.20, SD = 0.38). Female students had significantly higher GPA than male students, t(439) = -2.818, p = .005, d = -0.27, although academic self-efficacy did not differ significantly by gender, t(439) = 1.200, p = .231. The first cohort had significantly higher GPA than the second cohort, t(439) = 6.310, p < .001, d = 0.60, whereas the cohort difference in academic self-efficacy was not significant. Academic self-efficacy had a weak positive association with GPA, r(439) =.103, p = .030. Gender did not significantly moderate this association, delta R-squared = .004, F change(1, 437) = 1.641, p = .201.
Nursing students demonstrated high academic self-efficacy and Very Good academic performance. Fourth-year academic self-efficacy was positively but weakly associated with cumulative GPA, and this association did not differ significantly by gender. Because the variables were measured cross-sectionally and cumulative GPA included earlier academic performance, the findings do not establish that current self-efficacy predicted past achievement. Nursing education programs should therefore consider broader academic, curricular, psychosocial, and contextual factors when designing student support strategies.
Authors
Pacheco Pacheco, Dayrit Dayrit, Cornejo Cornejo, Nageeb Nageeb, Alrashidi Alrashidi, Alrashidi Alrashidi, Alrashidi Alrashidi, Llego Llego
View on Pubmed