[Not Available].
Under section 3-1 of the Norwegian Mental Health Care Act, chief public health officers (CPHOs) have the authority to make decisions regarding compulsory medical examinations for individuals with suspected severe mental illness requiring treatment. This is an intrusive intervention, and procedures and practice are strictly regulated by law and regulations. Our aim was to survey the practices, organisation and administrative aspects of decisions on compulsory medical examinations by local authorities in Norway.
In autumn 2024, a digital survey was distributed to all 357 local authorities in Norway, with CPHOs as the intended recipients.
We received responses from 173 CPHOs, 115 of whom were aware of the number of decisions made by their local authority under section 3-1. Ninety-seven reported that the decisions were stored in the local authority's case management system, as required by law. Nearly all provided written justification for the decisions and signed them with their own name. Eighty-one indicated who had raised concerns in the decision and communicated the decision to the patient whenever possible.
There was a lack of comprehensive data on the extent of decisions under section 3-1 in local authorities, and practices varied considerably. This lack of oversight makes quality assurance and improvement efforts challenging.
In autumn 2024, a digital survey was distributed to all 357 local authorities in Norway, with CPHOs as the intended recipients.
We received responses from 173 CPHOs, 115 of whom were aware of the number of decisions made by their local authority under section 3-1. Ninety-seven reported that the decisions were stored in the local authority's case management system, as required by law. Nearly all provided written justification for the decisions and signed them with their own name. Eighty-one indicated who had raised concerns in the decision and communicated the decision to the patient whenever possible.
There was a lack of comprehensive data on the extent of decisions under section 3-1 in local authorities, and practices varied considerably. This lack of oversight makes quality assurance and improvement efforts challenging.