Outcome and Safety of Radioligand Therapy With [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 After Re-Progression in mCRPC Patients Previously Treated With [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.
To enhance the effectiveness of radioligand therapy (RLT), new prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting radiopharmaceuticals utilizing alternative radionuclides are under active investigation. One promising alternative to the established 177 Lu is the use of 161 Tb. A key advantage of 161 Tb is its emission of a higher proportion of low-energy conversion and Auger electrons, which may contribute to enhanced therapeutic effectiveness. This study provides a first exploratory evaluation of the efficacy and safety of [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 in patients with progression after [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, aiming to generate early clinical insights.
The study included 15 patients with mCRPC, who were enrolled in the "prospective registry to assess outcome and toxicity of targeted radionuclide therapy in patients with mCRPC in clinical routine" (REALITY Study; NCT04833517). All patients had received conventional PSMA RLT using [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, which resulted in initial biochemical response (PSA decline ≥50%), followed by a biochemical relapse, prompting the re-initiation of PSMA RLT using [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617. Patients received a median of 3 (range: 2-7) cycles with mean administered activity of 5.4 ± 1.1 GBq and mean cumulative activity of 19.2 ± 6.4 GBq [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617. Treatment response was assessed both biochemically by serum PSA levels and through molecular imaging by total lesion PSMA (TLP) on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans. Adverse events were assessed at baseline and follow-up using the "Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events" (Version 5.0).
[ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT showed response rates of 66.7% (10/15 patients) based on biochemical assessment and 86.7% (13/15 patients) based on molecular imaging assessment. Beginning with the initiation of [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months. In total, 6 CTCAE grade deteriorations from grade 2 to grade 3 or from grade 3 to grade 4 were observed. No discontinuation of PSMA RLT due to adverse events was reported.
[ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT emerges as a promising treatment option, demonstrating encouraging response rates, preliminary clinical outcomes, and a favorable safety profile as second-line RLT in progressing patients who previously benefited from [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT.
The study included 15 patients with mCRPC, who were enrolled in the "prospective registry to assess outcome and toxicity of targeted radionuclide therapy in patients with mCRPC in clinical routine" (REALITY Study; NCT04833517). All patients had received conventional PSMA RLT using [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, which resulted in initial biochemical response (PSA decline ≥50%), followed by a biochemical relapse, prompting the re-initiation of PSMA RLT using [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617. Patients received a median of 3 (range: 2-7) cycles with mean administered activity of 5.4 ± 1.1 GBq and mean cumulative activity of 19.2 ± 6.4 GBq [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617. Treatment response was assessed both biochemically by serum PSA levels and through molecular imaging by total lesion PSMA (TLP) on [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scans. Adverse events were assessed at baseline and follow-up using the "Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events" (Version 5.0).
[ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT showed response rates of 66.7% (10/15 patients) based on biochemical assessment and 86.7% (13/15 patients) based on molecular imaging assessment. Beginning with the initiation of [ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.4 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months. In total, 6 CTCAE grade deteriorations from grade 2 to grade 3 or from grade 3 to grade 4 were observed. No discontinuation of PSMA RLT due to adverse events was reported.
[ 161 Tb]Tb-PSMA-617 RLT emerges as a promising treatment option, demonstrating encouraging response rates, preliminary clinical outcomes, and a favorable safety profile as second-line RLT in progressing patients who previously benefited from [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT.
Authors
Rosar Rosar, Burgard Burgard, Hoang Hoang, Blickle Blickle, Bartholomä Bartholomä, Maus Maus, Hein Hein, Bastian Bastian, Speicher Speicher, Schaefer-Schuler Schaefer-Schuler, Ezziddin Ezziddin
View on Pubmed