Patient perspectives on artificial intelligence in mammography interpretation: a comparative survey study of safety-net and academic hospital settings.
To evaluate and compare patient perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) use in mammogram interpretation across academic and safety-net healthcare settings.
We offered a 29-item survey to patients visiting our safety-net (SNH) and academic (ACH) hospital breast imaging clinics between 04/2024-06/2024 and 02/2023-08/2023, respectively. Demographic data was compared between populations using Chi-squared tests. We used ORs (95% CI) to estimate response odds by patient factors. Significant group differences were further analyzed via multivariable regression.
A total of 924 [ACH: 518(56.1%), SNH: 406(43.9%)] surveys were collected. Participants from the ACH were older (≥ 70 years: 20%vs3.1%, p < 0.001), mostly identified as Non-Hispanic White (56%vs7.2%, p < 0.001), had higher income (≥ $100,000: 49%vs3.2%, p < 0.001), higher education (≥ college: 71%vs20%, p < 0.001) and higher self-reported knowledge of AI (68%vs56%, p < 0.001) compared to SNH. Use of AI alone or as a second reader was accepted by 74%, with SNH participants being less likely to accept [OR(95%CI): 0.71(0.53-0.96), p = 0.02]. SNH participants were more likely to request a reading by AI following radiologist-interpreted abnormalities [1.83(1.35-2.49), p < 0.001], rate AI as the same or better than a radiologist at detecting cancer [1.54(1.12-2.15), p = 0.01], and have higher concern regarding data privacy [1.87(1.22-2.93), p = 0.01]. Higher education [1.99(1.33-2.99), p < 0.001] and self-reported AI knowledge [1.98(1.38-2.83), p < 0.001] were associated with higher acceptance of AI use, while Non-Hispanic Black race [0.40(0.25-0.65), p < 0.001] was associated with lower acceptance when controlled for other covariates.
Significant differences exist in patients' views of AI between the demographically distinct academic and safety-net populations. Our study revealed lower educational attainment and Non-Hispanic Black race as independent factors associated with lower acceptance of AI.
We offered a 29-item survey to patients visiting our safety-net (SNH) and academic (ACH) hospital breast imaging clinics between 04/2024-06/2024 and 02/2023-08/2023, respectively. Demographic data was compared between populations using Chi-squared tests. We used ORs (95% CI) to estimate response odds by patient factors. Significant group differences were further analyzed via multivariable regression.
A total of 924 [ACH: 518(56.1%), SNH: 406(43.9%)] surveys were collected. Participants from the ACH were older (≥ 70 years: 20%vs3.1%, p < 0.001), mostly identified as Non-Hispanic White (56%vs7.2%, p < 0.001), had higher income (≥ $100,000: 49%vs3.2%, p < 0.001), higher education (≥ college: 71%vs20%, p < 0.001) and higher self-reported knowledge of AI (68%vs56%, p < 0.001) compared to SNH. Use of AI alone or as a second reader was accepted by 74%, with SNH participants being less likely to accept [OR(95%CI): 0.71(0.53-0.96), p = 0.02]. SNH participants were more likely to request a reading by AI following radiologist-interpreted abnormalities [1.83(1.35-2.49), p < 0.001], rate AI as the same or better than a radiologist at detecting cancer [1.54(1.12-2.15), p = 0.01], and have higher concern regarding data privacy [1.87(1.22-2.93), p = 0.01]. Higher education [1.99(1.33-2.99), p < 0.001] and self-reported AI knowledge [1.98(1.38-2.83), p < 0.001] were associated with higher acceptance of AI use, while Non-Hispanic Black race [0.40(0.25-0.65), p < 0.001] was associated with lower acceptance when controlled for other covariates.
Significant differences exist in patients' views of AI between the demographically distinct academic and safety-net populations. Our study revealed lower educational attainment and Non-Hispanic Black race as independent factors associated with lower acceptance of AI.