Suicidality in Postpartum Women With Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Secondary Analysis Comparing Self-Reported and Clinician Assessments.

Objective: To investigate the alignment of self-harm ideation ratings with clinical assessments of suicidality in postpartum women diagnosed with unipolar and bipolar depression and the impact of trauma and psychiatric diagnosis on this alignment. Methods: Data from the largest postpartum depression screening study (n=10,000) in the US were examined in this secondary analysis. Inclusion criteria were a positive depression screen (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS] ≥10), a psychiatric diagnosis (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV), and a suicidality assessment derived from the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS). Trauma exposure, including both childhood and adult physical and sexual abuse, was measured using 4 yes/no questions from the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule. Associations between key variables were examined using independent samples t tests, analysis of variance, χ2 tests, or Fisher exact tests. Nonparametric tests were used for skewed continuous data. To assess the consistency between the EPDS and SIGH-ADS scales, Cohen κ statistics were used, with weighted κ applied to severity ratings and simple κ for binary categorizations. Results: Among 1,155 screen-positive postpartum women (68% White, 25.5% African American, 6.6% other; mean age 27.93 years), 21% endorsed self-harm ideation and 10.1% reported suicidality. Compared to those with unipolar depression, women with bipolar disorder had more than twice the odds of suicidality (odds ratio [OR] 2.77, 95% CI, 1.86 to 4.13, P<.001) and nearly 4 times the odds (OR 3.92, 95% CI, 1.18 to 13.00, P<.001) of not self-reporting self-harm ideation. Overall concordance between self-report (EPDS10) and clinical evaluation (SIGH-ADS11) was 78.6% (κ=0.28, 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.34, fair agreement) but varied significantly by diagnosis (P<.001), with lower concordance in the bipolar group (67.3%; κ=0.21) compared to the unipolar group (80.4%; κ=0.31). In the high-risk bipolar disorder group, concordance was no longer statistically significant, indicating poor alignment between self-report and clinical evaluation for these patients. Trauma was strongly associated with suicidality and a bipolar diagnosis. Conclusion: The EPDS does not consistently detect suicidality in perinatal bipolar patients, with our study showing only slight and nonsignificant agreement with clinical assessment in this high-risk group. Given that risk can change quickly in postpartum bipolar patients, timely and frequent clinical assessments are needed to identify high-risk individuals. Tracking and integrating routine bipolar disorder screening and trauma assessments in perinatal care may enhance early identification of suicide risk and improve maternal mental health outcomes.
Mental Health
Access
Care/Management
Advocacy

Authors

Herrick Herrick, Yang Yang, Stika Stika, Wisner Wisner
View on Pubmed
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Linkedin
Copy to clipboard