The competency-control paradox in parenting adolescents: Evidence from an Indian mixed-methods study.
Adolescence is a critical developmental period during which parenting practices interact with temperament and sociocultural context to shape mental health and adaptation. Most parenting models are derived from Western settings, with limited evidence from India.
This simultaneous mixed methods study drew on cross sectional data from the Indian Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (cVEDA) cohort, including adolescents aged 12-17 years (parent report n = 931; child report n = 836). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on parent and child versions of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 31 adolescents and their parents and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings were integrated at the interpretation stage.
The original APQ structure did not replicate. Parent reports yielded three dimensions-Involvement/Positive Parenting, Poor Monitoring, and Corporal Punishment-while child reports yielded five, distinguishing father's and mother's involvement. Inconsistent disciplining did not emerge as a distinct construct. Qualitative findings indicated high involvement and behavioural and psychological control, largely driven by academic goals. Adolescents experienced these practices as both supportive and restrictive, with parental openness shaping communication. Contextual pressures, including resource constraints and urban stressors, contributed to a competency-control paradox.
Parenting of adolescents in India must be understood within its relational and sociocultural ecology. While involvement and control function as primary supports, excessive control may constrain broader competency development. Integrating parent and adolescent perspectives is essential for culturally grounded research and intervention.
This simultaneous mixed methods study drew on cross sectional data from the Indian Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (cVEDA) cohort, including adolescents aged 12-17 years (parent report n = 931; child report n = 836). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on parent and child versions of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 31 adolescents and their parents and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings were integrated at the interpretation stage.
The original APQ structure did not replicate. Parent reports yielded three dimensions-Involvement/Positive Parenting, Poor Monitoring, and Corporal Punishment-while child reports yielded five, distinguishing father's and mother's involvement. Inconsistent disciplining did not emerge as a distinct construct. Qualitative findings indicated high involvement and behavioural and psychological control, largely driven by academic goals. Adolescents experienced these practices as both supportive and restrictive, with parental openness shaping communication. Contextual pressures, including resource constraints and urban stressors, contributed to a competency-control paradox.
Parenting of adolescents in India must be understood within its relational and sociocultural ecology. While involvement and control function as primary supports, excessive control may constrain broader competency development. Integrating parent and adolescent perspectives is essential for culturally grounded research and intervention.
Authors
Sharma Sharma, Jacob Jacob, V S V S, Venkataramanan Venkataramanan, Benegal Benegal,
View on Pubmed