Tobacco Use, Stigma, and Coping in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Their Psychosocial Interactions and Clinical Implications.
Lung cancer carries a high psychosocial burden. Tobacco use, the stigma attached to the disease, and coping strategies are thought to interact and shape psychological outcomes, yet they have rarely been examined together. This review aimed to synthesise the evidence on the relationship between tobacco use, lung cancer stigma, and coping, and how these factors interact and influence patients' psychological outcomes.
Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, PubMed/MEDLINE and Dialnet were searched (window 2014-April 2026) for empirical studies conducted in adults with lung cancer that addressed stigma, coping, or relevant psychological outcomes (e.g., anxiety, depression, distress, or quality of life). Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus and, where needed, by a third reviewer. Methodological quality was appraised with design-specific tools (JBI for cross-sectional and cohort studies, CASP for qualitative studies, and COSMIN-oriented criteria for the psychometric study). Given the clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a structured narrative synthesis was conducted following the SWiM guideline. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework.
Twenty-four studies were included. Stigma was prevalent and consistently associated with depression, anxiety, distress, and poorer quality of life, with longitudinal evidence indicating that stigma precedes and predicts distress. Internalised stigma (guilt, shame, self-blame) was the facet most strongly linked to depression and anxiety. Smoking history graded stigma intensity (current > former > never smokers) but did not determine it, since clinically significant stigma also affected never-smokers. Adaptive coping (e.g., fighting spirit, positive reappraisal) and social support were consistently associated with better psychological adjustment and quality of life, while maladaptive coping (e.g., helplessness, avoidance, anxious preoccupation) was associated with worse outcomes; cross-sectional evidence further indicated that coping modes mediated the relationship between stigma and quality of life and that social support and self-compassion attenuated the impact of stigma on distress.
Internalised stigma is a central, modifiable psychosocial stressor in lung cancer that affects smokers and never-smokers alike. Systematic screening for stigma, coping, and social support, together with non-stigmatising care, is warranted.
Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, PubMed/MEDLINE and Dialnet were searched (window 2014-April 2026) for empirical studies conducted in adults with lung cancer that addressed stigma, coping, or relevant psychological outcomes (e.g., anxiety, depression, distress, or quality of life). Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus and, where needed, by a third reviewer. Methodological quality was appraised with design-specific tools (JBI for cross-sectional and cohort studies, CASP for qualitative studies, and COSMIN-oriented criteria for the psychometric study). Given the clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a structured narrative synthesis was conducted following the SWiM guideline. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework.
Twenty-four studies were included. Stigma was prevalent and consistently associated with depression, anxiety, distress, and poorer quality of life, with longitudinal evidence indicating that stigma precedes and predicts distress. Internalised stigma (guilt, shame, self-blame) was the facet most strongly linked to depression and anxiety. Smoking history graded stigma intensity (current > former > never smokers) but did not determine it, since clinically significant stigma also affected never-smokers. Adaptive coping (e.g., fighting spirit, positive reappraisal) and social support were consistently associated with better psychological adjustment and quality of life, while maladaptive coping (e.g., helplessness, avoidance, anxious preoccupation) was associated with worse outcomes; cross-sectional evidence further indicated that coping modes mediated the relationship between stigma and quality of life and that social support and self-compassion attenuated the impact of stigma on distress.
Internalised stigma is a central, modifiable psychosocial stressor in lung cancer that affects smokers and never-smokers alike. Systematic screening for stigma, coping, and social support, together with non-stigmatising care, is warranted.
Authors
Sánchez-Ros Sánchez-Ros, Tomás-Aguirre Tomás-Aguirre, PĂ©rez-Bermejo PĂ©rez-Bermejo, Murillo-Llorente Murillo-Llorente, Legidos-GarcĂa Legidos-GarcĂa, Ventura Ventura, Mayordomo-Rodriguez Mayordomo-Rodriguez
View on Pubmed