Validating the FRAC-Stroke score: targeting those at highest risk of fracture.
Fracture risk is increased after stroke, but there is a lack of specific, effective tools to screen and prevent minimal trauma fractures (MTF) post-stroke. While the FRAC-Stroke score, developed to predict fracture risk post-stroke, shows promising performance, it has not yet been widely adopted or validated in large cohorts outside of Canada.
We aimed to: 1) evaluate the reliability and validity of the FRAC-Stroke score in predicting MTF; and 2) determine the optimal score to classify patients at highest fracture risk following ischaemic stroke.
A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using data from the PRECISE study, which included person-level linked administrative data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR, 2014-2016). The FRAC-Stroke score at hospital discharge was determined for survivors of ischemic stroke, aged >50 years, using coded comorbidities derived in the prior 5-year period and modified Rankin Scale. Fine-Gray models were built to evaluate associations of the FRAC-Stroke score with MTF within 12 months post-discharge, accounting for death as the competing risk.
Among 4545 adults, the median FRAC-Stroke score was 8 (interquartile range 5-11) and 118 patients (2.6%) sustained a MTF within 12 months post-discharge. The optimal FRAC-Stroke score cut-point to stratify MTF risk was 11.5, with a c-statistic of 0.70. Participants with a FRAC-Stroke score >12 (vs <12) had a 5.5-fold increased risk of MTF (confidence interval 3.8-7.9, p<0.01). When stratified by quintiles of FRAC-Stroke score, those in quintile 5 (FRAC-Stroke score >14) had a 15.2-fold increased risk of MTF than those in quintile 1 (FRAC-Stroke score <3; confidence interval 6.6-35.2, p<0.01).
The FRAC-Stroke score reliably identifies increased fracture risk in the Australian ischemic stroke population, with a score of 12+ able to discriminate those at high risk of fracture.
We aimed to: 1) evaluate the reliability and validity of the FRAC-Stroke score in predicting MTF; and 2) determine the optimal score to classify patients at highest fracture risk following ischaemic stroke.
A retrospective cohort study was undertaken using data from the PRECISE study, which included person-level linked administrative data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR, 2014-2016). The FRAC-Stroke score at hospital discharge was determined for survivors of ischemic stroke, aged >50 years, using coded comorbidities derived in the prior 5-year period and modified Rankin Scale. Fine-Gray models were built to evaluate associations of the FRAC-Stroke score with MTF within 12 months post-discharge, accounting for death as the competing risk.
Among 4545 adults, the median FRAC-Stroke score was 8 (interquartile range 5-11) and 118 patients (2.6%) sustained a MTF within 12 months post-discharge. The optimal FRAC-Stroke score cut-point to stratify MTF risk was 11.5, with a c-statistic of 0.70. Participants with a FRAC-Stroke score >12 (vs <12) had a 5.5-fold increased risk of MTF (confidence interval 3.8-7.9, p<0.01). When stratified by quintiles of FRAC-Stroke score, those in quintile 5 (FRAC-Stroke score >14) had a 15.2-fold increased risk of MTF than those in quintile 1 (FRAC-Stroke score <3; confidence interval 6.6-35.2, p<0.01).
The FRAC-Stroke score reliably identifies increased fracture risk in the Australian ischemic stroke population, with a score of 12+ able to discriminate those at high risk of fracture.
Authors
Stokes Stokes, Trinh Trinh, Andrew Andrew, Cadilhac Cadilhac, Ebeling Ebeling, Borschmann Borschmann, Kilkenny Kilkenny, Kim Kim, Dalli Dalli, Milat Milat
View on Pubmed